Belly fat isn’t just about looks — it’s a serious health concern.
Too much fat around your abdomen can increase your risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and inflammation. So, if you’re looking to burn belly fat, you may be wondering: cycling vs running — which is more effective?
Both are excellent forms of cardio exercise, but each has its own pros and cons when it comes to losing weight, improving health, and specifically targeting belly fat.
Let’s break down the benefits of each and find out which one suits you best.
Belly fat, also known as visceral fat, is stored deep around your abdominal organs. Unlike subcutaneous fat (the fat under your skin), visceral fat is metabolically active and linked to:
To reduce belly fat, experts recommend a combination of cardio exercise, healthy eating, sleep, and stress management. That’s where cycling and running come in.
Cycling is a low-impact, joint-friendly cardio workout that is especially ideal for beginners or overweight individuals. Here’s what it offers:
Cycling at a moderate pace can burn 300–600 calories per hour, helping you stay in a calorie deficit — the key to fat loss.
Cycling raises your heart rate steadily, improving circulation, oxygen flow, and heart health. Studies show it may increase HDL (good) cholesterol and reduce LDL (bad) cholesterol and triglycerides.
It targets major leg muscles: glutes, quads, hamstrings, and calves — and uphill cycling adds more resistance for muscle endurance and toning.
Unlike running, cycling has no impact, making it ideal for people with knee pain, arthritis, or those recovering from injuries.
Running is one of the highest calorie-burning exercises and is known for its fast results. Here’s how it helps:
A 70–75 kg person can burn 600–800 calories per hour running at a moderate pace — more than cycling at the same intensity.
Running gets your heart rate up quickly, improving lung capacity, blood pressure, and cardiovascular endurance more rapidly.
Running places stress on your bones, which signals your body to build stronger, denser bones — especially in the legs and hips.
Running works your abs, quads, hamstrings, calves, and hip flexors — helping tone and tighten your midsection.
A study published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that both cycling and running reduced body fat, including abdominal fat, in overweight participants.
Here’s a quick comparison:
Feature | Running | Cycling |
---|---|---|
Calorie Burn | Higher (600–800 kcal/hr) | Moderate (300–600 kcal/hr) |
Impact on Joints | High (risk of injury) | Low (joint-friendly) |
Muscle Focus | Whole body, esp. legs and core | Legs (quads, glutes) |
Beginner Friendly | Moderate | Excellent |
Bone Strength | Improves | Minimal effect |
Instead of choosing one, combine both for variety and balance:
This keeps workouts fun, targets different muscles, and reduces the risk of overtraining.
“If you’re overweight, have joint issues, or haven’t exercised in a while, start with cycling,” says fitness expert Abhi Singh Thakur.
“If you’re already active and looking to boost fat burn and cardio endurance fast, running can be more effective.”
Q: How many calories do cycling and running burn?
A 70–75 kg person may burn:
Q: Is running or cycling better for your heart?
Both improve heart health, but running builds heart endurance faster, while cycling is safer for joints.
Q: What builds more muscle — cycling or running?
When it comes to belly fat reduction, both cycling and running are effective — as long as you’re consistent and in a calorie deficit.
Wellness360 by Dr. Garg delivers the latest health news and wellness updates—curated from trusted global sources. We simplify medical research, trends, and breakthroughs so you can stay informed without the overwhelm. No clinics, no appointments—just reliable, doctor-reviewed health insights to guide your wellness journey